Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... vs Pousses de bambou
Overall, Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ...
Pousses de bambou
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In S... | Pousses de bambou |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 34 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has 68% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has no fat, while Pousses de bambou has 0.5 g.
- Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has no sugar, while Pousses de bambou has 0.5 g.
- Pousses de bambou has 60% more protein (2 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ...
55% pousse de bambou, eau, acide citrique.
Pousses de bambou
Pousse de bambou (52%), eau, régulateur d'acidité (acide ascorbique, acide citrique)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... or Pousses de bambou?
Overall, Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Vitasia Bambus Sprossen In Scheiben Lidl, Vitasia ... has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.