Comparison

Vertes cassées au basilic et à l'ail vs Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos

Overall, Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientVertes cassées au basilic et...Aceitunas verdes partidas ch...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 148 kcal 128 kcal
Fat 14.8 g 10.7 g
Saturated fat 2 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.2 g
Salt 3.1 g 2.4 g
Fiber 3 g —
Protein 1.3 g 1.8 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 13% fewer calories (128 kcal vs 148 kcal).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 28% less fat (10.7 g vs 14.8 g).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 21% less salt (2.4 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has 27% more protein (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).

Ingredients

Vertes cassées au basilic et à l'ail

Olives (origine Maroc), eau, basilic frais, huile de tournesol, pulpe d'ail frais, sel, acide citrique.

Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Vertes cassées au basilic et à l'ail or Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos?

Overall, Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aceitunas verdes partidas chupadedos has fewer calories: 128 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Vertes cassées au basilic et à l'ail has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons