Comparison

Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes vs Gaspacho rouge

Overall, Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientVelouté de légumes de nos ca...Gaspacho rouge
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 33 kcal 39 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 1.6 g 3 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.6 g
Fiber 1.4 g 1.6 g
Protein 0.8 g 0.9 g
Additives00
AllergensCeleryNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has 15% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 39 kcal).
  • Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has 45% less fat (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has 47% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3 g).
  • Gaspacho rouge has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes

vegetables 58,5% (carrots 15,7%, potatoes 14,6%, onions, green beans 6,7%, celeriac, cauliflower 2,8%, leeks 2,8%, tomato puree), water, extra virgin olive oil, salt, powdered lick, thyme, marjoram powder, pepper, from organic farming,

Gaspacho rouge

Légumes* 93,3% (jus de tomates* 56,8%, poivrons rouges* 13,5%, jus de concombre* 12,1%, oignons* 10,9%), huile d'olive vierge extra* 2%, vinaigre de vin rouge*, ail* 1,5%, jus de citron* 0,7%, sel. *issus de l'agriculture biologique.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes or Gaspacho rouge?

Overall, Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Velouté de légumes de nos campagnes has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons