Comparison

Unsweetened Vanilla Almond vs Oatly! Whole Oat Drink

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientUnsweetened Vanilla AlmondOatly! Whole Oat Drink
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 13 kcal 60 kcal
Fat 1 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat — 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 3.4 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.4 g 0.8 g
Protein 0.4 g 1.1 g
Additives42
AllergensNutsGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Unsweetened Vanilla Almond has 79% fewer calories (13 kcal vs 60 kcal).
  • Unsweetened Vanilla Almond has 63% less fat (1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Unsweetened Vanilla Almond has no sugar, while Oatly! Whole Oat Drink has 3.4 g.
  • Oatly! Whole Oat Drink has 48% more fiber (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Oatly! Whole Oat Drink has 62% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Oatly! Whole Oat Drink is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Unsweetened Vanilla Almond lists: Nuts.
  • Only Oatly! Whole Oat Drink lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Unsweetened Vanilla Almond

ALMONDMILK (FILTERED WATER, ALMONDS), TRICALCIUM PHOSPHATE, SEA SALT, NATURAL FLAVORS, GELLAN GUM, SUNFLOWER LECITHIN, LOCUST BEAN GUM, VITAMIN A PALMITATE, ERGOCALCIFEROL (VITAMIN D2), DL-ALPHA TOCOPHEROL ACETATE (VITAMIN E), CONTAINS ALMONDS.

Oatly! Whole Oat Drink

Water, OATS 10%, rapeseed oil, acidity regulator (dipotassium phosphate), minerals (calcium carbonate, potassium iodide), salt, vitamins (D, riboflavin, B12)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Unsweetened Vanilla Almond or Oatly! Whole Oat Drink?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Unsweetened Vanilla Almond has fewer calories: 13 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Unsweetened Vanilla Almond has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons