Comparison

Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc vs Reinert Salam de Sibiu

Overall, Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientUnicarm Specialitate ceafa p...Reinert Salam de Sibiu
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 306 kcal 462 kcal
Fat 22 g 40 g
Saturated fat 8.3 g 16 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 5 g —
Fiber 0 g 1 g
Protein 25 g 24 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedMustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc has 34% fewer calories (306 kcal vs 462 kcal).
  • Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc has 45% less fat (22 g vs 40 g).
  • Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc has 48% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 16 g).
  • Reinert Salam de Sibiu has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Reinert Salam de Sibiu has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
  • Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Reinert Salam de Sibiu lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc

Ceafa de porc fara os (origine UE), sare, zahar, condimente, antioxidant (izoascorbat de sodiu), conservant (nitrit de sodiu).

Reinert Salam de Sibiu

Carne de porc, slănină, sare, condiment dextroză, sirop de glucoză, antioxidant (ascorbat de sodiu conservant (nitrit de sodiu), cultură starter. Poate contine urme de: telină, muştar, lapte şi produse derivate.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc or Reinert Salam de Sibiu?

Overall, Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Unicarm Specialitate ceafa porc has fewer calories: 306 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Reinert Salam de Sibiu has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons