Nostja Carnat Kulen vs Reinert Salam de Sibiu
Overall, Reinert Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nostja Carnat Kulen | Reinert Salam de Sibiu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 434 kcal | 462 kcal |
| Fat | 36.2 g | 40 g |
| Saturated fat | 14.8 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.3 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Reinert Salam de Sibiu has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Reinert Salam de Sibiu has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Nostja Carnat Kulen has 11% more protein (27 g vs 24 g).
- Only Reinert Salam de Sibiu lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Nostja Carnat Kulen
Carne de porc, grasime de porc, sare, dextroza, sirop de glucoza, corector de aciditate: acid citric; antioxidanti: acid ascorbic, alfa-tocoferol; amestec de condimente, colorant: extract de ardei rosu; ardei iute Chili, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; culturi starter. Produs maturat si afumat cu lemn de fag. Pentru 100g produs se prelucreaza 158 g carne de porc.
Reinert Salam de Sibiu
Carne de porc, slănină, sare, condiment dextroză, sirop de glucoză, antioxidant (ascorbat de sodiu conservant (nitrit de sodiu), cultură starter. Poate contine urme de: telină, muştar, lapte şi produse derivate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nostja Carnat Kulen or Reinert Salam de Sibiu?
Overall, Reinert Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nostja Carnat Kulen has fewer calories: 434 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Reinert Salam de Sibiu has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.