Pikok Salam Tatra vs Reinert Salam de Sibiu
Overall, Reinert Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pikok Salam Tatra | Reinert Salam de Sibiu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 439 kcal | 462 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 40 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 1 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pikok Salam Tatra has 13% less saturated fat (14 g vs 16 g).
- Reinert Salam de Sibiu has 69% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.6 g).
- Reinert Salam de Sibiu has 17% more protein (24 g vs 20 g).
- Only Reinert Salam de Sibiu lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pikok Salam Tatra
Carne de porc, untura de porc, carne de vita, sare, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; sorici de porc (sorici de porc, apa, stabilizator: carboximetilceluloza), preparat condimentar (sfecla rosie, dextroza, stabilizatori: difosfati, trifosfati; antioxidant: acid ascorbic; amestec de condimente, colorant: carmine).
Reinert Salam de Sibiu
Carne de porc, slănină, sare, condiment dextroză, sirop de glucoză, antioxidant (ascorbat de sodiu conservant (nitrit de sodiu), cultură starter. Poate contine urme de: telină, muştar, lapte şi produse derivate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pikok Salam Tatra or Reinert Salam de Sibiu?
Overall, Reinert Salam de Sibiu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pikok Salam Tatra has fewer calories: 439 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Reinert Salam de Sibiu has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.