Comparison

Pikok Salam Tatra vs Croamore Carnat Kulen

Overall, Croamore Carnat Kulen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPikok Salam TatraCroamore Carnat Kulen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 439 kcal 397 kcal
Fat 39 g 32.6 g
Saturated fat 14 g 13.6 g
Sugars 1.6 g 1.2 g
Salt 2.5 g 4.7 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 20 g 25.5 g
Additives31
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croamore Carnat Kulen has 16% less fat (32.6 g vs 39 g).
  • Croamore Carnat Kulen has 25% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Pikok Salam Tatra has 48% less salt (2.5 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Croamore Carnat Kulen has 22% more protein (25.5 g vs 20 g).

Ingredients

Pikok Salam Tatra

Carne de porc, untura de porc, carne de vita, sare, conservant: nitrit de sodiu; sorici de porc (sorici de porc, apa, stabilizator: carboximetilceluloza), preparat condimentar (sfecla rosie, dextroza, stabilizatori: difosfati, trifosfati; antioxidant: acid ascorbic; amestec de condimente, colorant: carmine).

Croamore Carnat Kulen

Carne de porc, grasime de porc, carne de vita, sare, extracte din amestec de condimente, extract din ardei gras cu rol de colorare, amestec de condimente, dextroza, antioxidanti: acid ascorbic, ascorbat de sodiu; conservant: nitrit de sodiu; culturi starter. Pentru 100g produs finit se prelucreaza 137g carne de porc si 15g carne de vita.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pikok Salam Tatra or Croamore Carnat Kulen?

Overall, Croamore Carnat Kulen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croamore Carnat Kulen has fewer calories: 397 kcal versus 439 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croamore Carnat Kulen has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons