Uncrustable vs Uncrustables
Overall, Uncrustable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Uncrustable | Uncrustables |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 382 kcal | 382 kcal |
| Fat | 19.1 g | 19.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.7 g | 3.7 g |
| Sugars | 16.2 g | 16.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 11.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts, Peanuts | Gluten, Peanuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Uncrustable is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Uncrustable lists: Milk, Nuts.
- Only Uncrustables lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Uncrustable
Hazelnut, Milk
Uncrustables
Enriched unbleached flour (wheat flour, malted barley flour, niacin, ferrous sulfate, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), water, unbleached whole wheat flour, sugar, yeast, soybean oil, salt, dough conditioner (enzymes, ascorbic acid, calcium peroxide), peanuts, grape juice, pectin, citric acid, potassium sorbate (preservative), fully hydrogenated vegetable oils (rapeseed and soybean), mono and diglycerides.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Uncrustable or Uncrustables?
Overall, Uncrustable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Uncrustable has fewer calories: 382 kcal versus 382 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uncrustable has less sugar: 16.2 g versus 16.2 g per 100 g.