Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl vs Trüffel Cashews
Overall, Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl
Trüffel Cashews
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Trüffel gehobelt und eingele... | Trüffel Cashews |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 179 kcal | 583 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 47 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 9 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 8 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has 69% fewer calories (179 kcal vs 583 kcal).
- Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has 77% less fat (11 g vs 47 g).
- Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has 79% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 9 g).
- Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has 98% less sugar (0.2 g vs 8 g).
- Trüffel Cashews has 49% less salt (1 g vs 2 g).
- Trüffel Cashews has 73% more protein (21 g vs 5.7 g).
- Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl
62 % Sommer Trüffel (Tuber Aestivum Vitt.), 36 % Olivenöl, Salz, Aroma.
Trüffel Cashews
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl or Trüffel Cashews?
Overall, Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 583 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trüffel gehobelt und eingelegt in Olivenöl has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 8 g per 100 g.