Tropical Punch vs Infusion glacée relaxante Verveine, Lavande et Cerise
Overall, Tropical Punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tropical Punch
Infusion glacée relaxante Verveine, Lavande et Cerise
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Tropical Punch | Infusion glacée relaxante Ve... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 4 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tropical Punch has 62% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 11 kcal).
- Tropical Punch has no sugar, while Infusion glacée relaxante Verveine, Lavande et Cerise has 2.6 g.
- Infusion glacée relaxante Verveine, Lavande et Cerise is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Tropical Punch
Filtered Water, Cranberry Juice (water, cranberry juice concentrate), Natural Flavor, Citric Acid, Fumaric Acid, Sodium Citrate, Carrot Juice Concentrate (color), Ascorbic Acid (vitamin C), Stevia Leaf Extract (steviol glycosides).
Infusion glacée relaxante Verveine, Lavande et Cerise
Infusion de plantes françaises bio (eau, verveine*, lavande*, camomille romaine*), jus de cerise français (3%), sucre de betteraves français*, jus de citron", jus de cassis, jus de bluet des Vosges*.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tropical Punch or Infusion glacée relaxante Verveine, Lavande et Cerise?
Overall, Tropical Punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tropical Punch has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tropical Punch has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.