Comparison

Triple Berry Fruit Spread vs TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD

Overall, TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTriple Berry Fruit SpreadTRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT S...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 237 kcal 147 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g —
Sugars 52.6 g 35.3 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives21
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD has 38% fewer calories (147 kcal vs 237 kcal).
  • TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD has 33% less sugar (35.3 g vs 52.6 g).

Ingredients

Triple Berry Fruit Spread

FRUIT BLEND (BLUEBERRIES, BLACKBERRIES, RED RASPBERRIES), SUGAR, FRUIT PECTIN, CITRIC ACID.

TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD

rition ts 26 servings container Amount/serving Total Fat Og Sat. Fat Og ving size sp (17g) % DV Amount/serving 0% 0% % DV 2% 0% Total Carb. 6g Dietary Fiber Og Total Sugars 6g Incl. 5g Added Sugars 10% Trans Fat Og 0% Cholesterol Omg Sodium 5mg 0% Protein 0g ories 25 Vitamin D 0% Calcium 0% Iron 0% Potassium 0% erving dients: Organic Fruit (Organic Strawberries, Organic Blueberries, Organic Raspberries) Cane Sugar, Pectin Solution (Water, Fruit Pectin), Organic Lemon Juice Concentrate c Acid (Vitamin C).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Triple Berry Fruit Spread or TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD?

Overall, TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

TRIPLE BERRY Jammin' FRUIT SPREAD has less sugar: 35.3 g versus 52.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons