Comparison

Tripes à la provençale vs Tripes

Overall, Tripes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTripes à la provençaleTripes
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 99 kcal 84 kcal
Fat 4.1 g 1.9 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.1 g
Salt 1.1 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 14.7 g 16.5 g
Additives31
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tripes has 15% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 99 kcal).
  • Tripes has 54% less fat (1.9 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Tripes has 57% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Tripes has 88% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Tripes has 11% more protein (16.5 g vs 14.7 g).
  • Tripes has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tripes à la provençale

Estomacs et pieds de bœuf (67%), eau, concentré de tomates ratatouille 2% (tomate, eau, courgette, oignons, poivron, aubergine, huile végétale de tournesol, sel, sucre, épaississant: amidon modifié de mais, herbe de Provence, acidifiant: acide citrique), oignons, sel, maltodextrine, piment doux,extrait d'épices et de plantes aromatiques, pulpe d'ail, acidifiant: acide citrique, gélatine bovine, arôme naturel.

Tripes

Retirer l'emballage. Réchauffer 5min (1000W). d 3 bœuf (panses bonnets, feuillets, caillettes), piûds de desossés carottes, gélatine de porc, sel, vinaigre arôme, légumes (oianons, tomates, ca!0ttes), Gtucides dontsucres Protéines Sel A consommer . 2xbooge Nô de lot

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tripes à la provençale or Tripes?

Overall, Tripes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tripes has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 99 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tripes has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons