Tripel Karmeliet vs Mort subite kriek lambic
Overall, Tripel Karmeliet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Tripel Karmeliet
Mort subite kriek lambic
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripel Karmeliet | Mort subite kriek lambic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Avoine, Malt de froment | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mort subite kriek lambic has 38% fewer calories (47 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Tripel Karmeliet has no fat, while Mort subite kriek lambic has 5.3 g.
- Mort subite kriek lambic has 52% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Tripel Karmeliet has 93% more protein (7 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tripel Karmeliet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tripel Karmeliet lists: Avoine, Malt de froment.
Ingredients
Tripel Karmeliet
water, mout, tarwe, haver, gist, hop
Mort subite kriek lambic
EAU JUS DE CERISE À BASE DE CONCENTRÉ (19.8%), MALT D'_ORGE_, SIROP DE FRUCTOSE-GLUCOSE, _Blé_, CERISES (1,2%). EXTRAIT DE SUREAU. ARÔMES, LEVURES SAUVAGES, HOUBLON, EXTRAITS DE HOUBLON
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripel Karmeliet or Mort subite kriek lambic?
Overall, Tripel Karmeliet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mort subite kriek lambic has fewer calories: 47 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mort subite kriek lambic has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.