Leffe Royale Blonde vs Mort subite kriek lambic
Overall, Leffe Royale Blonde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Leffe Royale Blonde | Mort subite kriek lambic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 47 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leffe Royale Blonde has 55% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 47 kcal).
- Leffe Royale Blonde has no fat, while Mort subite kriek lambic has 5.3 g.
- Leffe Royale Blonde has 72% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Leffe Royale Blonde is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Leffe Royale Blonde
Eau, _malt d'orge_, mais, _orge_, houblon, sucre
Mort subite kriek lambic
EAU JUS DE CERISE À BASE DE CONCENTRÉ (19.8%), MALT D'_ORGE_, SIROP DE FRUCTOSE-GLUCOSE, _Blé_, CERISES (1,2%). EXTRAIT DE SUREAU. ARÔMES, LEVURES SAUVAGES, HOUBLON, EXTRAITS DE HOUBLON
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leffe Royale Blonde or Mort subite kriek lambic?
Overall, Leffe Royale Blonde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leffe Royale Blonde has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leffe Royale Blonde has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.