Tripel Karmeliet vs Leffe Royale Blonde
Overall, Leffe Royale Blonde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripel Karmeliet | Leffe Royale Blonde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Avoine, Malt de froment | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leffe Royale Blonde has 72% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- Leffe Royale Blonde has 87% less sugar (0.4 g vs 3 g).
- Tripel Karmeliet has 93% more protein (7 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Tripel Karmeliet lists: Avoine, Malt de froment.
Ingredients
Tripel Karmeliet
water, mout, tarwe, haver, gist, hop
Leffe Royale Blonde
Eau, _malt d'orge_, mais, _orge_, houblon, sucre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripel Karmeliet or Leffe Royale Blonde?
Overall, Leffe Royale Blonde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leffe Royale Blonde has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leffe Royale Blonde has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 3 g per 100 g.