Tripel Karmeliet vs 0.0% Flandrien
Overall, 0.0% Flandrien has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tripel Karmeliet | 0.0% Flandrien |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 5 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 7 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Avoine, Malt de froment | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 0.0% Flandrien has 93% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 76 kcal).
- 0.0% Flandrien has 95% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3 g).
- Tripel Karmeliet has 98% more protein (7 g vs 0.2 g).
- Only Tripel Karmeliet lists: Gluten, Avoine, Malt de froment.
Ingredients
Tripel Karmeliet
water, mout, tarwe, haver, gist, hop
0.0% Flandrien
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tripel Karmeliet or 0.0% Flandrien?
Overall, 0.0% Flandrien has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
0.0% Flandrien has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
0.0% Flandrien has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.