Comparison

Trio de Poivrons vs EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika

Overall, EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTrio de PoivronsEDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 52 kcal 38 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0 g
Sugars 4.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.4 g 0 g
Fiber 1.9 g —
Protein 1.3 g 1.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has 27% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 52 kcal).
  • EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has 78% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.3 g).
  • EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has no saturated fat, while Trio de Poivrons has 0.4 g.
  • EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has no sugar, while Trio de Poivrons has 4.6 g.
  • EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has no salt, while Trio de Poivrons has 0.4 g.

Ingredients

Trio de Poivrons

Poivrons* 56%, tomates* 20% (dés de tomates*, double concentre, coulis), oignons, huile d'olive* vierge extra extraite à froid, miel*, sel de mer, ail, piment d'Espelette AOP 0,1%, jus concentré de citron*, poivre noir*, thym.

EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika

GUT& GÜNSTIG NATUR TALENTE PAPRIKA ROT Abgepackt von: S.A.T. CAMPOSEVEN Ctra. Lo Romero 33 San Pedro del Pinatar Murcia (Spanien) RGSEAA: 21/23298-MU Ursprung: Spanien Klasse I Grösse:80-100mm Traz: 25GHC L-1705 für: EDEKA, www.edeka.de Gewicht: 500g 4311632 249734 EDEKA

FAQ

Which is healthier: Trio de Poivrons or EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika?

Overall, EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 52 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

EDEKA GEMÜSSE g&g paprika has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons