Treccine integrali vs Ciabattine
Overall, Ciabattine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Treccine integrali | Ciabattine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 438 kcal | 466 kcal |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 12.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 10.3 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciabattine has 23% less fat (12.4 g vs 16.1 g).
- Treccine integrali has 92% less sugar (0.4 g vs 4.8 g).
- Ciabattine has 100% less salt (0 g vs 2.8 g).
- Treccine integrali has 63% more fiber (6.5 g vs 2.4 g).
- Ciabattine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Treccine integrali
Farina di FRUMENTO (UE), farina di GRANO tenero integrale 20% (UE), olio di semi di girasole alto oleico, vino bianco, olio extravergine di oliva, sale. Può contenere SESAMO, SENAPE, LATTE e SOIA. RACCOLTA DIFFERENZIAT BUSTA PP 5 PLASTICA METALLO
Ciabattine
Farina di grano tenero tipo "0", olio di riso (11%), farina di frumento maltato, acqua. Può contenere semi di sesamo e soia.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Treccine integrali or Ciabattine?
Overall, Ciabattine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Treccine integrali has fewer calories: 438 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Treccine integrali has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.