Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC vs Cabillaud Façon Fish and Chips
Overall, Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tranches panées de Cabillaud... | Cabillaud Façon Fish and Chi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 210 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 11.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 14% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 210 kcal).
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 41% less fat (6.9 g vs 11.7 g).
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 45% less salt (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Cabillaud Façon Fish and Chips has 30% more fiber (1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Cabillaud Façon Fish and Chips lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC
Cabillaud 63,2%, panure 36,8% (farine de blé 16%, eau, huile de colza 6%, amidons, amidon modifié, levure, sel, épices). Traces éventuelles de lait, moutarde.
Cabillaud Façon Fish and Chips
65% Filets de cabillaud (Gadus morhua / Gadus marcrocephalus) (poisson), eau, farine de blé, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de maïs, amidon de blé, amidon modifié de maïs, gluten de blé, sel, poudres à lever : phosphate disodique - carbonate acide de sodium ; poudre de lait écrémé.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC or Cabillaud Façon Fish and Chips?
Overall, Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 210 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.