Traditional Quinoa vs Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht
Overall, Traditional Quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Traditional Quinoa | Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 395 kcal | 340 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | — |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 12.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht has 14% fewer calories (340 kcal vs 395 kcal).
- Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht has 69% less fat (1.7 g vs 5.6 g).
- Traditional Quinoa has no saturated fat, while Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht has 1.1 g.
- Traditional Quinoa has 28% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Traditional Quinoa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Traditional Quinoa is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Traditional Quinoa
White Quinoa
Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht
Pilaf bulgur (*wheat*, *gluten*) (75%), roasted wheat vermicelli (*wheat*, *gluten*) (25%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Traditional Quinoa or Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht?
Overall, Traditional Quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bulgur Mit Nudeln, Ungekocht has fewer calories: 340 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Traditional Quinoa has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.