Comparison

Tourte alsacienne à la viande vs Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling

Overall, Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTourte alsacienne à la viand...Tourte à l'alsacienne au Rie...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — —
Calories 308 kcal 282 kcal
Fat 18 g 16 g
Saturated fat 11 g 7.4 g
Sugars 1.4 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.5 g
Protein 7.5 g 9.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has 11% less fat (16 g vs 18 g).
  • Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has 33% less saturated fat (7.4 g vs 11 g).
  • Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has 22% more protein (9.6 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tourte alsacienne à la viande

Not available.

Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tourte alsacienne à la viande or Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling?

Overall, Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 308 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourte alsacienne à la viande has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons