Comparison

Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling vs Tourtes basquaises Coudène

Overall, Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTourte à l'alsacienne au Rie...Tourtes basquaises Coudène
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 282 kcal 296 kcal
Fat 16 g 16 g
Saturated fat 7.4 g 1.2 g
Sugars 1.5 g 3.4 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.5 g
Protein 9.6 g 6.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tourtes basquaises Coudène has 84% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has 56% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has 28% more protein (9.6 g vs 6.9 g).
  • Only Tourtes basquaises Coudène lists: Fish, Gluten.

Ingredients

Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling

Not available.

Tourtes basquaises Coudène

Farine de BLÉ 34%, piperade 28% (tomates, oignons, poivrons, double concentré de tomates, huile de colza, sel, sucre, jus de citron concentré, ail, arôme), eau, huile de colza, THON 8,5%, amidon de BLÉ, sel, herbes de Provence, basilic, piment, malt de BLÉ.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling or Tourtes basquaises Coudène?

Overall, Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 296 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tourte à l'alsacienne au Riesling has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons