Toreras vs Mix de vegetales con pepinillo
Overall, Mix de vegetales con pepinillo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Toreras
Mix de vegetales con pepinillo
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Toreras | Mix de vegetales con pepinil... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 37 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Toreras has 31% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Mix de vegetales con pepinillo has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Mix de vegetales con pepinillo has no saturated fat, while Toreras has 0.5 g.
- Toreras has 51% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Mix de vegetales con pepinillo has 47% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.4 g).
- Mix de vegetales con pepinillo has 44% more fiber (0.9 g vs 0.5 g).
- Toreras has 50% more protein (1.6 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Mix de vegetales con pepinillo lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Toreras
cebolla, pepino, aceituna, pimiento, acidulante: E-260, sal
Mix de vegetales con pepinillo
Hortalizas en proporción variable (pepinillo, maíz, zanahoria, pimiento rojo, apio), vinagre de vino, azúcar, sal, acidulante: ácido cítrico (E-330), antioxidante: ácido ascórbico (E-300) y conservante: metabisulfito sódico (E-223).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Toreras or Mix de vegetales con pepinillo?
Overall, Mix de vegetales con pepinillo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Toreras has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Toreras has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.