Toreras vs Picadillo de variantes
Overall, Picadillo de variantes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Toreras | Picadillo de variantes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Picadillo de variantes has 34% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 26 kcal).
- Picadillo de variantes has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Picadillo de variantes has 81% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Picadillo de variantes has 53% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Picadillo de variantes has 42% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.4 g).
- Only Picadillo de variantes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Toreras
cebolla, pepino, aceituna, pimiento, acidulante: E-260, sal
Picadillo de variantes
Hortalizas en proporción variable (pepinillo, zanahoria), vinagre de vino, sal, conservante (_metabisulfito sódico_).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Toreras or Picadillo de variantes?
Overall, Picadillo de variantes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Picadillo de variantes has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picadillo de variantes has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.