Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses vs Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg
Overall, Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses
Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomme de montagne allégée en... | Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 220 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 9.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21.5 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses has 11% fewer calories (220 kcal vs 246 kcal).
- Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses has 11% less saturated fat (8.5 g vs 9.5 g).
- Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg has 28% more protein (30 g vs 21.5 g).
- Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses
LAIT pasteurisé de vache ORIGINE FRANCE: sel; présure; FERMENTS LACTIQUES.
Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg
Ingrédients LAIT(thermisé - température inférieure à la pasteurisation)LAIT : origine France, sel, ferments, présure animale
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses or Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg?
Overall, Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tomme de montagne allégée en matières grasses has fewer calories: 220 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomme De Savoie Igp Lt 13%Mg has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.