Comparison

Tomate Séchée vs Sundried tomato antipasti

Overall, Sundried tomato antipasti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomate SéchéeSundried tomato antipasti
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 400 kcal 183 kcal
Fat 33 g 14.1 g
Saturated fat 4.6 g 1.6 g
Sugars 15 g 6.4 g
Salt 6.8 g 2.6 g
Fiber 8.9 g 7.9 g
Protein 6.3 g 3 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sundried tomato antipasti has 54% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Sundried tomato antipasti has 57% less fat (14.1 g vs 33 g).
  • Sundried tomato antipasti has 65% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Sundried tomato antipasti has 57% less sugar (6.4 g vs 15 g).
  • Sundried tomato antipasti has 62% less salt (2.6 g vs 6.8 g).
  • Tomate Séchée has 11% more fiber (8.9 g vs 7.9 g).
  • Tomate Séchée has 52% more protein (6.3 g vs 3 g).
  • Sundried tomato antipasti has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tomate Séchée

Tomates séchées 63% (tomates séchées, sel marin), huile de tournesol 32%, câpres, vinaigre de vin, sel marin, plantes aromatiques, ail.

Sundried tomato antipasti

Sunflower Oil, Rehydrated Sundried Tomatoes, Extra Virgin Olive Oil (2%), Salt, Sugar, Acidity Regulators (Citric Acid, Lactic Acid), Garlic, Oregano, Antioxidant (Ascorbic Acid), Water, Black Pepper.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomate Séchée or Sundried tomato antipasti?

Overall, Sundried tomato antipasti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sundried tomato antipasti has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sundried tomato antipasti has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons