Comparison

Tomate Frito Apis vs Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla

Overall, Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTomate Frito ApisSofrito casero de tomate y c...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 76 kcal 75 kcal
Fat 3.1 g 5.1 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.7 g
Sugars 7.2 g 4.8 g
Salt 1.5 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.2 g 1.8 g
Protein 1.5 g 1.3 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tomate Frito Apis has 39% less fat (3.1 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Tomate Frito Apis has 57% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has 33% less sugar (4.8 g vs 7.2 g).
  • Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has 33% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Tomate Frito Apis

Tomate (170g para elaborar 100g de producto), aceite de girasol, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, azúcar, manzana, almidón modificado, sal, aromas y especias,

Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla

Tomate 50% (tomate pelado, puré de tomate, concentrado de tomate), cebolla 37%, aceite de oliva virgen extra 9%, sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tomate Frito Apis or Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla?

Overall, Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Sofrito casero de tomate y cebolla has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons