Toblerone vs 80765936
Overall, Toblerone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Toblerone | 80765936 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 530 kcal | 561 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 34.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 22.9 g |
| Sugars | 56 g | 52.3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Toblerone has 14% less fat (30 g vs 34.9 g).
- Toblerone has 26% less saturated fat (17 g vs 22.9 g).
- Toblerone has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- 80765936 has 31% more protein (8.4 g vs 5.8 g).
- Only Toblerone lists: Eggs, Nuts.
Ingredients
Toblerone
Sucre, pâte de cacao, LAIT entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, miel (3%), AMANDES (1,6%), BEURRE concentré, émulsifiant (lecithines de SOJA), blancs d'OEUFS, arôme. Cacao: 28% minimum dans le chocolat au lait. Cacao: 50% minimum dans le chocolat noir
80765936
ecouverte de chocolat supérieur au lait contenant une surprise dans une caps ents: chocolat supérieur au LAIT 47% (sucre, LAIT en poudre, beurre de cacao, decas mysafarts: lecithines [SOJA vanilline), LAIT écrémé en poudre 17% sucre, grais es (parme, karité), BEURRE concentré, émulsifiants: lecithines [50]; vanilling Surte total: produits laitiers 32 %, cacao 15 %. Le chocolat utilisé est un chocolat pur beurre de cacao.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Toblerone or 80765936?
Overall, Toblerone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Toblerone has fewer calories: 530 kcal versus 561 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
80765936 has less sugar: 52.3 g versus 56 g per 100 g.