Comparison

80765936 vs Mentos White G Sweetmint

Overall, Mentos White G Sweetmint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient80765936Mentos White G Sweetmint
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 561 kcal 281 kcal
Fat 34.9 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 22.9 g 0.6 g
Sugars 52.3 g 0 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 8.4 g 0 g
Additives10
AllergensMilk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mentos White G Sweetmint has 50% fewer calories (281 kcal vs 561 kcal).
  • Mentos White G Sweetmint has 98% less fat (0.6 g vs 34.9 g).
  • Mentos White G Sweetmint has 97% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 22.9 g).
  • Mentos White G Sweetmint has no sugar, while 80765936 has 52.3 g.
  • 80765936 has 100% more protein (8.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Mentos White G Sweetmint has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only 80765936 lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

80765936

ecouverte de chocolat supérieur au lait contenant une surprise dans une caps ents: chocolat supérieur au LAIT 47% (sucre, LAIT en poudre, beurre de cacao, decas mysafarts: lecithines [SOJA vanilline), LAIT écrémé en poudre 17% sucre, grais es (parme, karité), BEURRE concentré, émulsifiants: lecithines [50]; vanilling Surte total: produits laitiers 32 %, cacao 15 %. Le chocolat utilisé est un chocolat pur beurre de cacao.

Mentos White G Sweetmint

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 80765936 or Mentos White G Sweetmint?

Overall, Mentos White G Sweetmint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mentos White G Sweetmint has fewer calories: 281 kcal versus 561 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mentos White G Sweetmint has less sugar: 0 g versus 52.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons