Tilsiter vs Tilsitter
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilsiter | Tilsitter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 88 kcal | 324 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilsiter has 73% fewer calories (88 kcal vs 324 kcal).
- Tilsiter has 73% less fat (7 g vs 26 g).
- Tilsiter has 76% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 19 g).
- Tilsiter has 94% less sugar (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tilsiter has 71% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tilsitter has 72% more protein (22 g vs 6.3 g).
- Tilsiter has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Tilsiter
Pasteurisierte Milch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
Tilsitter
Heumilch g.t.S., Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Calciumchlorid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilsiter or Tilsitter?
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilsiter has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 324 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tilsiter has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.