Tilsiter in Scheiben vs Tilsitter
Overall, Tilsiter in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilsiter in Scheiben | Tilsitter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 324 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.9 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilsiter in Scheiben has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Tilsitter has 17% less salt (1.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Tilsiter in Scheiben has 12% more protein (25 g vs 22 g).
Ingredients
Tilsiter in Scheiben
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen, mikrobielles Lab.
Tilsitter
Heumilch g.t.S., Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Calciumchlorid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilsiter in Scheiben or Tilsitter?
Overall, Tilsiter in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilsitter has fewer calories: 324 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tilsiter in Scheiben has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.