Tilsiter in Scheiben vs Tilsitter
Overall, Tilsiter in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilsiter in Scheiben | Tilsitter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 324 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 24 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilsiter in Scheiben has 11% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19 g).
- Tilsiter in Scheiben has no sugar, while Tilsitter has 0.5 g.
- Only Tilsitter lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Tilsiter in Scheiben
Je 1 Scheibe % 100g (36 g)** (36 g)* Brennwert 1367 kJ 492 KJ 6%
Tilsitter
Heumilch g.t.S., Speisesalz, Käsereikulturen, mikrobielles Lab, Calciumchlorid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilsiter in Scheiben or Tilsitter?
Overall, Tilsiter in Scheiben has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilsitter has fewer calories: 324 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tilsiter in Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.