Tilsiter vs Tilsiter in Scheiben
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tilsiter | Tilsiter in Scheiben |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 88 kcal | 330 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tilsiter has 73% fewer calories (88 kcal vs 330 kcal).
- Tilsiter has 73% less fat (7 g vs 26 g).
- Tilsiter has 74% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 17 g).
- Tilsiter has 74% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.7 g).
- Tilsiter in Scheiben has 74% more protein (24 g vs 6.3 g).
- Tilsiter has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tilsiter lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Tilsiter
Pasteurisierte Milch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskulturen (enthalten Milch), mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff.
Tilsiter in Scheiben
Je 1 Scheibe % 100g (36 g)** (36 g)* Brennwert 1367 kJ 492 KJ 6%
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tilsiter or Tilsiter in Scheiben?
Overall, Tilsiter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tilsiter has fewer calories: 88 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tilsiter in Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.