Thon entier au nature vs Thon entier nature
Overall, Thon entier nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Thon entier au nature | Thon entier nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 25 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Thon entier nature has 15% fewer calories (93 kcal vs 109 kcal).
- Thon entier nature has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Thon entier nature has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Thon entier au nature has 12% more protein (25 g vs 22 g).
- Thon entier au nature is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Thon entier au nature
Thon, eau, sel.
Thon entier nature
skipjack tuna (85%), water, salt, natural flavour
FAQ
Which is healthier: Thon entier au nature or Thon entier nature?
Overall, Thon entier nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Thon entier nature has fewer calories: 93 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Thon entier au nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.