Comparison

Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes vs Pâte de caille aux raisins

Overall, Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine Forestière Aux CèpesPâte de caille aux raisins
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 298 kcal 325 kcal
Fat 26 g 29 g
Saturated fat 10 g 11 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.9 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.7 g
Fiber — 0.8 g
Protein 15 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensEggsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 10% less fat (26 g vs 29 g).
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 22% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 13% more protein (15 g vs 13 g).
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes

Gorge de porc (Origine France), foie de orc (Origine France), cèpes (1%), œufs, sel, poivre.

Pâte de caille aux raisins

Gras de porc, foie de poulet, foie de porc, viandė de caille 15%, gorge de porc, viande séparée mécaniquement de caille 5%, raisins secs 2,5%, sel, épices et aromates, poivre. Fabriqué en France à partir de viandes: porc et caille origine UE. DÉCLARATION NUTRITIONNELLE

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes or Pâte de caille aux raisins?

Overall, Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons