Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes vs Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles
Overall, Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes
Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes | Terrine forestière aux cèpes... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 306 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 9.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles has no sugar, while Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 0.5 g.
- Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes lists: Eggs.
- Only Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes
Gorge de porc (Origine France), foie de orc (Origine France), cèpes (1%), œufs, sel, poivre.
Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles
foie de gras de porc, couenne de porc, eau, chanterelles cèpes (2,5 %) farine de blé, œuf* sel, arôme naturel, aimes, épices, plantes aromatiques, dextrose„
FAQ
Which is healthier: Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes or Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles?
Overall, Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 306 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Terrine forestière aux cèpes et chanterelles has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.