Comparison

Terrine forestiere ranou csn 180g vs Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes

Overall, Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTerrine forestiere ranou csn...Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 293 kcal 298 kcal
Fat 28 g 26 g
Saturated fat 9.4 g 10 g
Sugars 2.9 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.3 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 11 g 15 g
Additives60
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 83% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has 27% more protein (15 g vs 11 g).
  • Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Terrine forestiere ranou csn 180g lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Terrine forestiere ranou csn 180g

Gras de porc, foie de porc, eau, foie de poulet, couenne de porc, foie maigre de canard, champignons réhydratés 3,1%, farine de _blé_, sel, porto, protéines de _lait_, poudre de blanc d'_œuf_, armagnac, poudre de _lait_, arômes, dextrose, épices et aromates, acidifiant : acétate de sodium, stabilisants : polyphosphates, sucre, conservateurs : ascorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium, colorant : carmins,

Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes

Gorge de porc (Origine France), foie de orc (Origine France), cèpes (1%), œufs, sel, poivre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Terrine forestiere ranou csn 180g or Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes?

Overall, Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Terrine forestiere ranou csn 180g has fewer calories: 293 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Terrine Forestière Aux Cèpes has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons