Tartine doux vs Rama Sooo Buttrig!
Overall, Tartine doux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tartine doux | Rama Sooo Buttrig! |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 495 kcal | 713 kcal |
| Fat | 55 g | 79 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 26 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 6 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tartine doux has 31% fewer calories (495 kcal vs 713 kcal).
- Tartine doux has 30% less fat (55 g vs 79 g).
- Tartine doux has 42% less saturated fat (15 g vs 26 g).
- Tartine doux has no sugar, while Rama Sooo Buttrig! has 0.5 g.
- Rama Sooo Buttrig! has no salt, while Tartine doux has 0.4 g.
- Tartine doux has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tartine doux lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Tartine doux
Huiles et graisses végétales non hydrogénées 54% (colza, palmiste, palme 3,2%), eau, émulsifiants: mono et diglycérides d'acides gras, sel, lait écrémé en poudre, conservateur : sorbate de potassium, correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique, arômes (lait), antioxydant: extrait riche en tocophérols, vitamine B1, colorant : bêta-carotène
Rama Sooo Buttrig!
Pflanzliche Fette und Öle (Raps, Kokos, Sonnenblumen, in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Trinkwasser, Ackerbohnenprotein, Emulgator (Lecithin), natürliche Aromen, Farbstoff (Carotin), Glucose.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tartine doux or Rama Sooo Buttrig!?
Overall, Tartine doux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tartine doux has fewer calories: 495 kcal versus 713 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tartine doux has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.