St Huber Omega-3 sans sel vs Rama Sooo Buttrig!
Overall, St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | St Huber Omega-3 sans sel | Rama Sooo Buttrig! |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 468 kcal | 713 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 79 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 26 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 3 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has 34% fewer calories (468 kcal vs 713 kcal).
- St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has 34% less fat (52 g vs 79 g).
- St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has 42% less saturated fat (15 g vs 26 g).
- St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has no sugar, while Rama Sooo Buttrig! has 0.5 g.
- St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only St Huber Omega-3 sans sel lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
St Huber Omega-3 sans sel
Huiles et stéarines végétales 51% (colza 30%, palmiste, lin 5,4%, palme), eau, émulsifiants (lécithine de SOJA), arômes naturels, colorant (bêta-carotène), correcteur d'acidité (acide lactique). Traces éventuelles d'ARACHIDES
Rama Sooo Buttrig!
Pflanzliche Fette und Öle (Raps, Kokos, Sonnenblumen, in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Trinkwasser, Ackerbohnenprotein, Emulgator (Lecithin), natürliche Aromen, Farbstoff (Carotin), Glucose.
FAQ
Which is healthier: St Huber Omega-3 sans sel or Rama Sooo Buttrig!?
Overall, St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has fewer calories: 468 kcal versus 713 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
St Huber Omega-3 sans sel has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.