Comparison

Tartinable de boeuf vs Mielonka luksusowa

Overall, Tartinable de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTartinable de boeufMielonka luksusowa
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 181 kcal 233 kcal
Fat 11 g 19 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 7.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.9 g
Fiber 1.2 g 0.2 g
Protein 18 g 15 g
Additives12
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tartinable de boeuf has 22% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 233 kcal).
  • Tartinable de boeuf has 42% less fat (11 g vs 19 g).
  • Tartinable de boeuf has 70% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Mielonka luksusowa has no sugar, while Tartinable de boeuf has 0.7 g.
  • Tartinable de boeuf has 44% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Tartinable de boeuf has 88% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Tartinable de boeuf has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
  • Tartinable de boeuf has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Tartinable de boeuf

Viande de bœuf 59% (origine France), eau, tomates confites 12,5% tomates 30% origan, jus de citron concentré), huile de colza 6%, crème 3,5%, fécule et fibre vegétale, sel, arômes naturels, ail en poudre, poivre, sucre caramélisé, thym et laurier en poudre, antioxydant : extrait de romarin.

Mielonka luksusowa

mięso wieprzowe 94%, sól, stabilizatory: difosforany, pieprz biały, substancja konserwująca: azotyn sodu.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tartinable de boeuf or Mielonka luksusowa?

Overall, Tartinable de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tartinable de boeuf has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mielonka luksusowa has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons