Taralli tondi vs Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva
Overall, Taralli tondi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Taralli tondi
Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Taralli tondi | Taralli con olio extravergin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 463 kcal | 447 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 8.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva has 18% less fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva has 44% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Taralli tondi has 55% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2 g).
- Taralli tondi has 57% more fiber (3 g vs 1.3 g).
- Taralli tondi has 11% more protein (10 g vs 8.9 g).
- Only Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva lists: Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Taralli tondi
Not available.
Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva
WHEAT flour type "00", white wine (contains SULPHITES), olive oil, extra virgin olive oil 10%, salt. May contain SOY, MUSTARD, LUPIN, SESAME seeds and MILK derivatives.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Taralli tondi or Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva?
Overall, Taralli tondi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Taralli con olio extravergine di oliva has fewer calories: 447 kcal versus 463 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Taralli tondi has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2 g per 100 g.