Comparison

Swanson broth chicken vs Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal

Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSwanson broth chickenCaldo natural de pollo bajo...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 4 kcal 8 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.4 g 0 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.4 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Swanson broth chicken has no fat, while Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 0.4 g.
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has no sugar, while Swanson broth chicken has 0.4 g.
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 75% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 48% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Swanson broth chicken

Chicken stock**, chicken flavor**, sea salt, carrot juice**, onion juice**, garlic**, spice**, tomato paste**, turmeric**. **organic

Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal

Agua, pollo fresco de corral 22%, cebolla, zanahoria, puerro, col, apio, sal marina,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Swanson broth chicken or Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal?

Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Swanson broth chicken has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons