Comparison

Caldo casero de pollo bajo en sal30/4 vs Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal

Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaldo casero de pollo bajo e...Caldo natural de pollo bajo...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 5 kcal 8 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 0.4 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 0.4 g 0.8 g
Additives00
AllergensCelery, EggsCelery

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 50% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Caldo casero de pollo bajo en sal30/4 lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Caldo casero de pollo bajo en sal30/4

Agua, pollo 8,4%, aromas naturales (_huevo_, _apio_), _apio_ 0,3%, patata 0,2%, cebolla 0,1%, zanahoria 0,1%, sal, manteca de cerdo, especias.

Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal

Agua, pollo fresco de corral 22%, cebolla, zanahoria, puerro, col, apio, sal marina,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caldo casero de pollo bajo en sal30/4 or Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal?

Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caldo casero de pollo bajo en sal30/4 has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons