Caldo de pollo natural vs Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal
Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caldo de pollo natural | Caldo natural de pollo bajo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 83% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Caldo de pollo natural has 33% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Caldo de pollo natural
Agua, pollo fresco 33%, cebolla, puerro, _apio_, zanahoria, sal
Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal
Agua, pollo fresco de corral 22%, cebolla, zanahoria, puerro, col, apio, sal marina,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caldo de pollo natural or Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal?
Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caldo de pollo natural has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pollo natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.