Caldo de pollo vs Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal
Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caldo de pollo | Caldo natural de pollo bajo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 2 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo de pollo has 75% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 8 kcal).
- Caldo de pollo has no fat, while Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 0.4 g.
- Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has 50% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.4 g).
- Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Caldo de pollo
Agua, pollo 2,1 % (carne de pollo 86% y grasa de pollo 14 %), hortalizas en proporción variable 1,7 % (patata 0,58 %, cebolla, puerro 0,3 %, zanahoria 0,30 % y apio 0,2 %), sal, aroma natural, aroma, aceite de oliva virgen extra 0,1 %, extracto de carne y especia.
Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal
Agua, pollo fresco de corral 22%, cebolla, zanahoria, puerro, col, apio, sal marina,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caldo de pollo or Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal?
Overall, Caldo natural de pollo bajo en sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caldo de pollo has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.