Caldo de pollo vs Caldo de pollo natural
Overall, Caldo de pollo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caldo de pollo | Caldo de pollo natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 2 kcal | 7 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caldo de pollo has 71% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 7 kcal).
- Caldo de pollo natural has 71% less salt (0.8 g vs 2.8 g).
- Caldo de pollo natural has 67% more protein (1.2 g vs 0.4 g).
- Caldo de pollo natural has the better Nutri-Score.
- Caldo de pollo natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Caldo de pollo
Agua, pollo 2,1 % (carne de pollo 86% y grasa de pollo 14 %), hortalizas en proporción variable 1,7 % (patata 0,58 %, cebolla, puerro 0,3 %, zanahoria 0,30 % y apio 0,2 %), sal, aroma natural, aroma, aceite de oliva virgen extra 0,1 %, extracto de carne y especia.
Caldo de pollo natural
Agua, pollo fresco 33%, cebolla, puerro, _apio_, zanahoria, sal
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caldo de pollo or Caldo de pollo natural?
Overall, Caldo de pollo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caldo de pollo has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 7 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pollo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.