Šunka vs Šunka
Overall, Šunka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Šunka | Šunka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 135 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 6 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Šunka has 19% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 135 kcal).
- Šunka has 29% less fat (5 g vs 7 g).
- Šunka has 48% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Šunka has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Šunka
73% meso svinjskog buta, voda, kuhinjska sol, kalijev klorid, stabilizatori: difosfati, polifosfati; regulator kiselosti: trifosfati; zgušnjivač: prerađena morska alga euchema; škrob, šećer, dekstroza, arome, aroma dima, antioksidans: natrijev askorbat; konzervans: natrijev nitrit.
Šunka
70% meso svinjskog buta, voda, kuhinjska sol, kalijev klorid, stabilizatori: difosfati, polifosfati; regulator kiselosti: trifosfati; zgušnjivač: prerađena morska alga euchema; škrob, šećer, dekstroza, arome, aroma dima, antioksidans: natrijev askorbat; konzervans: natrijev nitrit.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Šunka or Šunka?
Overall, Šunka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Šunka has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 135 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Šunka has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1 g per 100 g.