Šunka vs Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně
Overall, Šunka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Šunka | Kostelecká debrecínská pečen... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 5 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 6 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Šunka has 13% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 126 kcal).
- Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně has 34% less fat (3.3 g vs 5 g).
- Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Šunka has 25% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně has 35% more protein (23 g vs 15 g).
- Šunka has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Šunka
70% meso svinjskog buta, voda, kuhinjska sol, kalijev klorid, stabilizatori: difosfati, polifosfati; regulator kiselosti: trifosfati; zgušnjivač: prerađena morska alga euchema; škrob, šećer, dekstroza, arome, aroma dima, antioksidans: natrijev askorbat; konzervans: natrijev nitrit.
Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně
Vepřová pečeně bez kosti 80%, pitná voda, jedlá sůl, stabilizátory E250, É451, antioxidant E316 zahušťovadlo E407a, bramborový škrob, koření a extrakty koření.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Šunka or Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně?
Overall, Šunka has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Šunka has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kostelecká debrecínská pečeně has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.