Sun-dried tomato vs Tomates Sechees 340 Gr
Overall, Sun-dried tomato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sun-dried tomato | Tomates Sechees 340 Gr |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 15.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 7.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 3.2 g |
| Fiber | 7.9 g | — |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sun-dried tomato has 22% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 208 kcal).
- Sun-dried tomato has 24% less fat (12 g vs 15.8 g).
- Sun-dried tomato has 22% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
- Sun-dried tomato has 15% less sugar (6.4 g vs 7.5 g).
- Sun-dried tomato has 60% less salt (1.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Tomates Sechees 340 Gr has 23% more protein (3.9 g vs 3 g).
- Sun-dried tomato has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sun-dried tomato is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sun-dried tomato
mariņade with extra virgin olive oill sundried tomatoes in a sunflower oil (1.5%), garlic and oregaño.
Tomates Sechees 340 Gr
Tomates séchées partiellement réhydratées 53% (dioxyde de soufre), Huile de tournesol, Huile d'olive vierge extra, Sel, sucre, Origan, Poivre noir moulu, Ail (en poudre), Arômes, Correcteurs d'acidité : acide lactique, acide citrique ; Affermissant : Chlorure de calcium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sun-dried tomato or Tomates Sechees 340 Gr?
Overall, Sun-dried tomato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sun-dried tomato has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sun-dried tomato has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.